Donate to Illuminate Contact TSF
Visit us on Facebook Visit us on Twitter Visit us on YouTube Visit us on Instagram Visit us on Linkedin Visit us on Tiktok
Comparison of live and fixed cell-based assay performance: implications for the diagnosis of MOGAD in a low-middle income country

Comparison of live and fixed cell-based assay performance: implications for the diagnosis of MOGAD in a low-middle income country

Journal: Frontiers in Immunology; August 29, 2023

Author(s): Lekha Pandit, Anitha D’Cunha, Chaithra Malli and Akshatha Sudhir

Comparison of two diagnostic tests for MOGAD in an Indian population

The diagnosis of MOGAD poses many clinical challenges because the disease has many features similar to MS and NMOSD. This study compared two diagnostic techniques for MOGAD – (a) a live cell-based assay (LCBA) that is more expensive and requires more technical skills and infrastructure and a fixed cell-based assay (FCBA) that is commercially developed, cost-effective, and easier to conduct at scale. Whereas some earlier studies have shown that the LBCA is more effective and accurate than the FCBA for MOGA diagnosis, this study showed that the diagnostic value of both assays were similar. In India where this study was done, most patients are uninsured and medical costs are managed out-of-pocket, so these results offer hope for more cost-effective diagnostic screening at scale.

Free Access: Full text

Read the Full Text

Industry Partners

Community Partners

WARNING: Internet Explorer does not support modern web standards. This site may not function correctly on this browser and is best viewed on Chrome, Firefox or Edge browsers. Learn More.